ABSTRACT
This article explores the concept of mind-building sculpture—a sculptural approach that transcends aesthetics and function to engage with the intellectual, emotional, and psychological landscapes of the observer. It examines how contemporary and classical sculptors embed cognitive frameworks within form, material, and spatial interaction, transforming sculpture into a catalyst for reflection, learning, and internal transformation. Drawing on examples from art history, phenomenology, and neuroscience, the study underscores sculpture’s profound capacity to shape not only physical space but the human mind.
Keywords: mind-building, psychological, contemporary, beliefs, perceptions, emotions, and introspections cognitive, classical, intellectual, aesthetics, mind, and neuroscience.
REFERENCES
Ascott, R. (2003). Telematic embrace: Visionary theories of art, technology, and consciousness.
University of California Press.
Bennett, J. (2018). The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossings, and ethics. Princeton
University Press.
Bishop, C. (2005). Installation art: A critical history. Tate Publishing.
Curtis, P. (2015). Antony Gormley. Tate Publishing.
Danto, A. C. (2001). The Madonna of the future: Essays in a pluralistic art world. Farrar, Straus
and Giroux.
Lippard, L. R. (1983). Overlay: Contemporary art and the art of prehistory. Pantheon Books.
Marion, J.-L. (2000). The crossing of the visible (J. K. A. Smith, Trans.). Stanford University
Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan
Paul.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT Press.
Smith, K. (2011). Ai Weiwei. Phaidon Press.
Wilson, S. (2010). Art + science now: How scientific research and technological innovation are
becoming key to 21st-century aesthetics. Thames & Hudson.
Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts
education. OECD Publishing.
Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press.